Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Appleton vs Zoe Howard Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Appleton vs Howard analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Appleton vs Zoe Howard Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Appleton 1 - 0 Howard
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Appleton has won 47.14% of points on their second serve, while Howard has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Appleton, in recent form, has won 52.01% of their opponent's second serve points, while Howard has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Appleton has saved 51.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Howard has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Appleton has won 55.22% of matches played (W/L 37/ 30), with Howard winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 13/ 17). Howard has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 12/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.38% of matches (W/L 35/ 26), where as Howard has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Appleton winning 1 times and Howard being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Appleton winning 2 and Howard winning 1. The last match between Appleton and Howard was at the W15 Jerusalem, 12-05-2021, First, Hard with Emily Appleton getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Appleton and Howard have played a deciding set 1 times, with Appleton winning 1 times and Howard 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Appleton winning 0, and Howard 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Appleton has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.87 while Howard has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Appleton has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Howard has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Appleton has converted 40.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Howard has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
356
Rank
356
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
51% (187-181)
Career Total W/L
57% (37-28)
60% (24-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,804
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emily Appleton | Zoe Howard |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:22:0 | 2:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (51/80) | 62% (66/106) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (32/51) | 58% (38/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (13/29) | 45% (18/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 26% (6/23) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (50/106) | 44% (35/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Emily Appleton
Player
Zoe Howard
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
106)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Appleton | Zoe Howard |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (24/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (49/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (418/388) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.61 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 241 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.59 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 231 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:6 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.85 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1491/2556) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1044/1491) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (502/1065) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (124/305) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1148/2713) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (22/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (24/40) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 89% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 86% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (20/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (20/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (20/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Emily Appleton
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naiktha Bains
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Yexin Ma
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Emily Appleton
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Taylah Preston
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Marina Stakusic
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
13
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Alicia Dudeney
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Emily Appleton
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Zoe Howard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Zoe Howard
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zoe Howard
Player
Laetitia Pulchartova
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zoe Howard
Player
Michika Ozeki
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
49 of
86)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iveta Dapkute
Player
Zoe Howard
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zoe Howard
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zoe Howard
Player
Margarita Ignatjeva
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Valeriya Olyanovskaya
Player
Zoe Howard
45%
(
30 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zoe Howard
Player
Maria Sholokhova
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zoe Howard
Player
Nastja Kolar
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
2
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
1
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
33%
(
14 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
51 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zoe Howard
Player
Anastasiya Poplavska
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Appleton Vs Howard Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Appleton are available here and Howard photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
